Legal Opinion
State v. King
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 12, 1977No. 46842PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGOSHESKE, Justice.
The state appeals from an order dismissing a complaint charging defendant on April 21,1976, with the unlawful possession of phentermine, an alleged Schedule IV controlled substance not expressly listed as such in Minn. St. 1974, § 152.02, subd. 5. Prior to the charge against defendant, the State Board of Pharmacy (board) had designated phentermine a controlled substance by its legislatively delegated authority contained in Minn. St. 152.02, subds. 8 and 12. The principal questions raised are whether the legislature intended by § 152.02, subds. 8 and 12, to give the board…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lee v. DelmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Anderson v. Commissioner of HighwaysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State v. ArmingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Cassell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- State v. LiskCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. CalmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- People v. TurmonMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
- Pueblo v. González VegaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1999
- Christopher Tiplick v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.