Legal Opinion
Beecher v. Leavenworth State Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 22, 1946No. 11244PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Beecher has appealed from several orders of the district court. Among them is an order of November 3, 1945, permitting the appellee to resume proceedings in the superior court of the State of Washington in foreclosure of appellee’s lien on the orchard and home of Beecher, a part of the bankruptcy estate, by allowing a sheriff’s sale of the property.
We are of the opinion that the district court had no power to grant such an order during the pendency of the proceeding under Section 75, sub. s, of the Frazier-Lemke Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203, sub. s, at this stage of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Union Joint Stock Land Bank of Detroit v. ByerlySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Bastian v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Schriever v. Oxford Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beecher v. Leavenworth State BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Beecher v. Leavenworth State BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Beecher v. Leavenworth State BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- S. P. Beecher v. Homer Smithson, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- S. P. Beecher v. Leavenworth State BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951