Legal Opinion

In re Hilton

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 24, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On motion to set aside an order staying proceedings in a state court.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

The principal question presented on this motion is whether an unliquidated claim that might have been liquidated and proved against the bankrupt, but which was voluntarily withheld for more than 15 months after adjudication and until the expiration of the period allowed by section 57(n) for proving claims, should be treated as a “provable debt” under section 17, so as to be barred by the bankrupt’s discharge, and entitling the bankrupt to a stay on a pending suit thereon in the state court under section 11. In my judgment it should be so treated. The facts are as follows:

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re SchwartzU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1877
  2. Rankin v. Florida, A. & G. C. R.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1868

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1906
  2. Dycus v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Pearce v. FisherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API