Legal Opinion
Dixie Aluminum Products Co. v. Mitsubishi International Corp.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided February 12, 1992No. 1:91-cr-00191PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
O’KELLEY, Chief Judge.
A hearing was held in the captioned case pursuant to the court’s order of November 22, 1991, for the defendant Mitsubishi International Corp. (“MIC”) to show cause why the plaintiff Dixie Aluminum’s (“Dixie”) request for a stay of arbitration should not be granted [4-1]. The case is also submitted on MIC’s motion for a more definite statement [7-1].
GENERAL FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The dispute arises from contracts between Dixie and MIC for the sale of Japanese-manufactured steel coils by MIC to Dixie in 1987 and 1988. Since 1985, MIC and Dixie have engaged in twenty-two…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Schulze and Burch Biscuit Company v. Tree Top, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Trans-Aire International, Inc. v. Northern Adhesive Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Sasser & Co. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pycsa Panama, S.A. v. Tensar Earth Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
- Wilson Fertilizer & Grain, Inc. v. ADM Milling Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Trans-Tec Asia v. M/V HARMONY CONTAINERDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Avedon Engineering, Inc. v. SeatexDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2000
- Hunt v. Up North Plastics, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.