Legal Opinion

Delaney v. Valentine

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term, Saratoga county. Action by William J. Delaney, as receiver in supplementary-proceedings of the property of Thomas B. Valentine, against Thomas-B. Valentine, William H. Lockwood, and Ann Lockwood, to set-aside, as in fraud of creditors, certain mortgages and an assignment made by Thomas B. Valentine. The complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtMayham, P. J.

This action was prosecuted by the plaintiff!, as receiver of the property of Thomas B. Valentine, to have two chattel mortgages executed to Ann A. Lockwood, and an assignment of certain choses in action to William H. Lockwood,, declared fraudulent and void as to the claims of the plaintiff as receiver, and as to the plaintiff, as such receiver, set aside, on the ground that the same were given by the defendant Thomas B-Valentine and received by the said defendants Ann A. Loclnvood. and William H. Lockwood for the purpose and with the intent. of hindering, delaying, and defrauding the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Murphy v. . BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Knapp v. . McGowanNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Barney v. . GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  5. Royer Wheel Co. v. . FieldingNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sommers v. CottentinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Hardt v. DeutschNew York Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Sommers v. CottentinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Delaney v. ValentineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API