Legal Opinion

Hardt v. Deutsch

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

, Creditor’s action to subject mortgaged chattels to the satisfaction of plaintiffs’ judgments.

1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.

The action is a creditor’s suit to subject mortgaged chattels to the satisfaction of plaintiffs’ judgments.

The mortgages in controversy, payable on demand, and covering all the merchandise 'in the mortgagors’ store, were executed on the 16th of May, 1896, by the firm of Deutsch & Co.; one to Wallach & Schiele, as security for $42,514.06, of which $17,514.06 was an antecedent debt, and $25,000 was advanced at the time; the other to Nathan Silverstein for $17,400,-of which $12,400 was an. antecedent debt, and $5,000 an advance at the time. The consideration of the mortgages goes without…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Becker v. . KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Mandeville v. . AveryNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Tremaine v. . MortimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Jaeger v. . KelleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Kitchen v. . LoweryNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Glover v. EhrlichAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API