Legal Opinion

Bragg v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 2, 1928PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaNey, J.

On December 4, 1926, appellant, Zac T. Bragg, and 33 others applied by petition in writing to the county court of Crittenden County, describing the territory proposed to be embraced, for the incorporation of the village of West Memphis. The territory described is rather elongated and odd shaped, running from its northern boundary south along both sides of State Highway 61 to its intersection with State Highway No. 70, a distance of one mile, thence east along both sides of 70 for ia distance of one mile, thence south across the levee to the Mississippi River, a distance of about 1% miles:

Accor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. Sharum v. MeriwetherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  3. Waldrop v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  4. Stumpff v. Louann Provision Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Four States Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. Strawn v. CampbellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  3. Lambert v. ReevesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  5. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. MunsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API