Legal Opinion · Dissent

Danks v. . Quackenbush

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1848PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On error from the Supreme Court. Banks sued Quackenbush in the .Common Pleas of Onondaga County, in replevin for taking a horse and harness.

Read the full summary

On error from the Supreme Court. Banks sued Quackenbush in the .Common Pleas of Onondaga County, in replevin for taking a horse and harness. The case was this: In January, 1837, one Fitch recovered judgment against Banks m the Supreme Court, in an action upon contract, for $83 85. In January, 1843, an alias fieri facias was issued on the judgment, and delivered to Quackenbush, who was a Beputy Sheriff,, and who took the property in question by virtue of the execution; and for that taking the suit was brought. On the trial Banks claimed that the property was exempt from execution by the act of…

1DissentGardiner, J.

The decision of the Supreme Court will be affirmed, (upon an equal division of the members of this Court) as I understand, upon the ground exclusively, that the exemption act of 1842, under a retrospective construction, is in violation of that provision of the Constitution of the United States, which prohibits the States from passing any law impairing the obligation of contracts.

■ The law in question is as follows: “ In addition to the articles now exempt, there shall be exempted from distress and levy and. sale, necéssary household furniture, and working tools, and team owned by any person…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Bronson v. KinzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  3. McCulloch v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  4. Mathewson v. WellerNew York Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brearley School, Ltd. v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Deering v. BoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  3. Boyer v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Moore v. LetchfordTexas Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Long Is. Pine Barrens Socy., Inc. v. County of SuffolkNew York Supreme Court, Suffolk County · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API