Legal Opinion

Marinik v. Cascade Group

City of Cleveland Municipal Court

Decided October 8, 1999No. 99 CVF 17837PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert Ziccardi, Magistrate.

This cause came on for hearing on August 30, 1999, before Magistrate Robert Ziccardi to whom the matter was referred pursuant to Civ.R. 53(C) to hear all issues of law and fact relating to the post-garnishment of personal property allegedly owned by the judgment-debtor, The Cascade Group (“Cascade”). Both parties were present and represented by counsel: Heide L. Herrmann for the judgment-creditor, Mark S. Marinik; Errol A. Can, for the judgment-debtor.

The case was reset for further hearing on September 13, 1999. Errol A. Can withdrew as counsel for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,745, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 49, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 143 in Re William v. Harrell. Robert P. Abele v. Phoenix Suns Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. In Re I.D. Craig Service Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. In Re LiebmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. E. Liverpool v. Buckeye Water Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Rayle v. Bowling Green State UniversityOhio Court of Claims · 2000
  3. Jarvis v. PomposOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Burhill Leasing Corp. v. GrahamOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Wulco, Inc. v. O'Gara Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API