Martin v. Martin
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Justice.
The pendente lite exceptions complain because the trial judge refused to admit in evidence the testimony of the wife to the effect that the husband acquiesced in certain acts that were not in accordance- with the judgment awarding permanent alimony. This was not error for the reason that we are here dealing with a judgment awarding permanent alimony, and the parties, or even the court itself, can not change or alter a decree of permanent alimony. Wilkins v. Wilkins, 146 Ga. 382 (91 S. E. 415); Gilbert v. Gilbert, 151 Ga. 520 (107 S. E. 490); Coffee v. Coffee, 101 Ga. 787 (28 S.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coffee v. CoffeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Wilkins v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Gilbert v. GilbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Swindell v. SwindellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Burks v. MullinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
3Cited by7 opinions
- Yancey v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Chorney v. ChorneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Fernandez v. FernandezSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Dotson v. Henry County Board of Tax AssessorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Buxton v. HookerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.