State v. Hopkins
Court of Appeals of Washington
1DissentGrosse, J.
(dissenting) — Under Apprendi v. New Jersey,6 only those facts that increase the statutory maximum sentence must be determined by the trier of fact. The fact of a blood alcohol concentration of .15 or above does not increase the statutory maximum penalty for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. License suspension is a consequence of conviction, but is not a part of a defendant’s sentence. And even if it were, former RCW *57146.61.5055 (1998) set forth the minimum length of license suspension, not the maximum. Apprendi is therefore not applicable.
The majority is incorrect in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. McClendonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.