Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Hopkins

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 24, 2001No. 46244-0-IPublished

1DissentGrosse, J.

(dissenting) — Under Apprendi v. New Jersey,6 only those facts that increase the statutory maximum sentence must be determined by the trier of fact. The fact of a blood alcohol concentration of .15 or above does not increase the statutory maximum penalty for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. License suspension is a consequence of conviction, but is not a part of a defendant’s sentence. And even if it were, former RCW *57146.61.5055 (1998) set forth the minimum length of license suspension, not the maximum. Apprendi is therefore not applicable.

The majority is incorrect in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. McClendonWashington Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API