Legal Opinion

Hargraves v. Hamilton Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 27, 1944No. 6PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, J.

By his appeal herein Honorable J. M. Hargraves of the Chattanooga Bar seeks a reversal of the judgment below sustaining an execution and garnishment based upon a judgment against him as surety upon a replevin bond. It is insisted that for the various reasons covered by the assignments of error the judgment upon which the execution issued is void and that the trial court erred in overruling a motion to quash.

On October 12, 1942, defendant in error, Hamilton National Bank, instituted an original attachment suit in the Court of General Sessions against R. M. Sheridan pursuant to which Sheridan’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Leeper, Graves & Co. v. First Nat. Bank of HobartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. O'Brien v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Three States Lumber Co. v. BlanksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  4. Frazier v. Nashville Gas & Heating Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Glosson v. GlossonTennessee Supreme Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Monday v. MillsapsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  2. Quarles v. ArthurCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
  3. Vest v. BitnerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
  4. General Insurance Company of America v. DeenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Albuquerque National Bank v. Second Judicial District CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API