Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Cunningham

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 10, 1985No. 83-3471-NJ-1; CA A32804PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Husband appeals from the decree in a dissolution proceeding. He argues that the trial court erred in setting the awards of child and spousal support and in evaluating and dividing the marital assets. We affirm.

The parties were married for 19 years. Husband was 42 and wife was 39 at the time of trial. Wife was awarded custody of their children, ages 14 and 18. Husband works as a natural resource manager for the United States Bureau of Land Management and has a net monthly income of $1,648; he participates in a retirement program and receives medical coverage as part of his compensation. Wife…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Smith v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. In re the Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of KiserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. In re the Marriage of MahaffeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. In re the Marriage of HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API