Legal Opinion

403-411 East 65th Street Corp. v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 13, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

This is a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum under Rule 45(b) of the new Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The subpoena commanded the production of the following records at an examination before trial of an employee of defendant, Ford Motor Company:—

“1. All books, papers, records, memoranda, checks, correspondence, cancelled vouchers and all other documents and papers relating to the leasing and/or subleasing of the garage located at No. 401-411 East 65th Street, Borough of Manhattan, New York City.
“2. Together with all such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Carpenter v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pathe Laboratories, Inc. v. Du Pont Film Mfg. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  2. Chase Nat. Bank v. Portland General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  3. Ellis-Foster Co. v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Baldwin Locomotive WorksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Baldwin Locomotive WorksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API