Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

National Labor Relations Board v. Baldwin Locomotive Works

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 6, 1942No. 7639Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CLARK] Circuit Judge

(concurring and dissenting).

I agree with my learned colleagues that the respondent has failed to make its point about the trial examiner and about not being chargeable with unfair labor practices while in' reorganization. As the preparation of this opinion has required me to give some attention to the record, I might even agree with them that the union disestablished by the Labor Board was most decidedly company dominated. However, inasmuch as it is my view that this Court should remand the case before passing upon that issue, I am filing this opinion. As I approach the…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API