Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Goodwin Pontiac Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1957No. Docket 20, Calendar 46,922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Plaintiff’s decedent (hereinafter referred to as Daniels) purchased a used Pontiac car from Robert Smith Mercury, Inc., and shortly after purchase brought the car to defendant’s shop for repairs on the hydramatie transmission.

When engine trouble developed Daniels returned this car to the dealer from which he purchased same, namely, Robert Smith Mercury, Inc.

' Yery shortly after receiving the car again from Robert Smith Mercury, Inc., Daniels experienced trouble with the transmission and contacted defendant and was informed that if the defect was defendant’s fault, then the repairs would be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Newton v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Spence v. Sturgis Steel Go-Cart Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. JenningsMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Atlas Concrete Pipe, Inc. v. Roger J. Au & Son, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
  3. City of Auburn v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API