Legal Opinion

Dixon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 26, 1980No. 41978PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Senior Judge.

Movant Willie Dixon, hereafter defendant, appeals the post-hearing denial of his Rule 27.26 motion.

Defendant had been convicted of murder and on appeal the judgment was affirmed. His motion for re-hearing or transfer was denied. State v. Dixon, 566 S.W.2d 254 (Mo.App.1978).

We limit our review to the points specifically raised in the motion below1 and *783thereafter briefed on appeal.2 So considered, defendant contended below and now contends here he was denied effective assistance of counsel; this, because after the judgment was affirmed and his motion for re-hearing and/or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hemphill v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Maggard v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  3. Plant v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Camillo v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Willis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Munoz v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Lawrence v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API