Legal Opinion

Liesny v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This is a motion made by defendant upon the minutes of the court for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDeAngelis, J.

While the motion was pending, no stay of entry of judgment upon the verdict having been granted, the plaintiff entered judgment upon the verdict and served notice thereof. Pending the argument upon the motion, on the last day to appeal from the judgment, in order to protect its rights, the defendant appealed from the judgment to the Appellate Division. Upon the hearing of the motion the plaintiff raises the preliminary objection that the pend-ency of the appeal in the Appellate Division deprived this court of jurisdiction to determine the motion. I do not think the appeal has that effect. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adam v. . Manhattan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. National Contracting Co. v. Hudson River Water Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Schuell v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank Savings Life Insurance v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. Liesny v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API