Legal Opinion

Turner v. Saka

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1974No. 7220PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Gunderson, J.:

The mother of two “illegitimate” children here challenges an order of our district court which honored an ex parte New Jersey court order as a matter of “comity,” and on that basis granted the father “temporary” custody through a writ of habeas corpus. 1 In our view, the New Jersey court’s order is not entitled to “comity,” because it was entered under circumstances offensive to our understanding of procedural due process. Hence, we reverse with instructions to dismiss the father’s petition. We also deny an application the father has filed in this court,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. May v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Fantony v. FantonySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. In Re T.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Abell v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. LeBlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  2. Hill v. Summa CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People Ex Rel. Irby v. DuboisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Alice v. RonaldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Monroe, Ltd. v. Central Telephone Co., Southern Nevada DivisionNevada Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API