Legal Opinion · Dissent

National Labor Relations Board v. Isis Plumbing & Heating Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 23, 1963No. 18364_1Published

1DissentDuniway, Circuit Judge

I dissent. If this court were the original trier of fact, I might reach the same conclusion as my brethren. But we are not the original triers of fact, nor are we re-triers of fact. Universal Camera does not make us re-triers of fact. In Radio Officers’ Union of Commercial Telegraphers Union, A. F. L. v. N. L. R. B., 1954, 347 U.S. 17, 50, 74 S.Ct. 323, 340-341, 98 L.Ed. 455, the Supreme Court said “that insofar as the power to draw reasonable inferences is concerned, TaftHartley did not alter prior law.” It is the Board that draws inferences. It is also the rule that conflicts in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Walton Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Whitin MacHine WorksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, Local 10Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API