Legal Opinion

Thomas Russell Crow v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 2, 1968No. 9432_1PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

The district court denied appellant’s application for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 without a hearing. On his pleas of guilty appellant was sentenced to three years for a postal offense and to three years for violation of the Dyer Act, the sentences to run consecutively. Later he received a sentence for escape which was to run consecutively to the Dyer Act sentence. He attacks the sentences for the postal offense and for the Dyer Act.

When the case was originally presented to us, the record did not disclose which sentence the appellant was serving. Relying on Parker…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Parker v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. John Joseph Putnam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Fontaine v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Clark v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In Re IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Peter Ray Laycock v. State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. William Marrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API