Legal Opinion

Williamson Pounders Architects PC v. TUNICA COUNTY

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 10, 2010No. 09-60063PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge:

This suit is about choice of law. The choices are the law of Mississippi and that of Tennessee. We must choose because an architectural firm brought suit against a Mississippi county and its governing board under a contract that made Tennessee’s law controlling. The Mississippi district court granted summary judgment in favor of the county, finding the contract’s choice was overridden by the public policy of the State in which suit was brought. We AFFIRM.

I. FACTS

In May 2001, Tunica County, Mississippi, and Williamson Pounders Architects (“WPA”) entered into…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Boardman v. United Services Auto. Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  3. V. L. Nicholson Co. v. Transcon Investment & Financial Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Cherokee Pump & Equipment Inc. v. Aurora PumpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Butler v. Board of Sup'rs for Hinds CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pike County v. Indeck Magnolia, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2012
  2. O'Fallon v. Encore Receivable Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2011
  3. Lagrone Construction, LLC v. Landmark, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2014
  4. McCurley v. HolmesDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2021
  5. Raymond v. Unum GroupDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API