Legal Opinion

Ihlenfeld v. Seyler

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The nature of this controversy will require a statement in some detail of the facts involved. However, it will be useful at the outset to state that it is not questioned that a gross fraud was perpetrated upon plaintiff although there are conflicting contentions as to the respective parts and consequent liability 'of the several defendants joined. The grounds upon which the nonsuit was granted were that the representations were of such a character that plaintiff was not entitled to rely upon them, and that, in any event, the statute of limitations had barred plaintiff because she discovered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Dell v. BurnhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Thom v. SensenbrennerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Gottschalk v. ZieglerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alioto v. HoltzmanDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
  2. Marine National Exchange Bank v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API