Legal Opinion

Detroit Motor Appliance Co. v. Taylor

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided September 13, 1933No. 369PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

The mandate of the United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit upon the decision reported in 66 F.(2d) 319, reversed the decree of this court finding the patent invalid, and directed that the court “enter a decree in favor of appellant finding the claims of the patent in issue to be valid and infringed, and awarding to appellant such further relief as it is in such case entitled to have.”

Plaintiff has tendered a deeree including findings of validity and infringement, and awarding to plaintiff a writ of perpetual injunction restraining -each of the defendants from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sandusky Foundry & Machine Co. v. De LavaudDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1918
  2. Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1922
  3. Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Champion Ignition Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1917
  4. Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Electrose Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1907
  5. Postage Meter Co. v. Standard Mailing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aeration Processes, Inc. v. Walter Kidde & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1948
  2. Detroit Motor Appliance Co. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1933
  3. Novco v. GraingerMontana Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API