Legal Opinion
St. Germaine v. Pendergast
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 29, 1993PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*699Nolan, J.
The plaintiffs, Francis X. St. Germaine, III (Kip),2 and his parents, appeal from a Superior Court judge’s dismissal of their action against Michael E. Pendergast for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. This action, brought pursuant to G. L. c. 143, § 51, as amended by St. 1992, c. 66, is the second action the plaintiffs have brought against Pendergast to recover for injuries resulting from an accident on June 15, 1989. Kip seeks recovery for the severe and permanent injuries he sustained when a wall being erected collapsed on him during the construction of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leibovich v. AntonellisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- St. Germaine v. PendergastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Nantucket Conservation Foundation, Inc. v. Russell Management, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Town of Canton v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
3Cited by34 opinions
- Okerman v. VA Software Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Carleton v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Commonwealth v. McGheeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. ColeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.