Legal Opinion
Doe v. Lucy
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 6, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
1. It appeared at the trial that in 1910 three actions for rent were brought against the defendant on behalf of Isaac Weil, the lessor, by one J. Butler Studley, an attorney. In these suits one Samuel W. Forrest, an attorney, entered his appearance for the defendant. The plaintiff offered in evidence Mr. Studley’s deposition in which he testified that Mr. Weil told him that Mr. Forrest brought the keys of the leased premises to his (Weil’s) store and stated that he returned them on behalf of the defendant, but that he (Weil) refused to accept them. To the introduction of this testimony the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lassone v. Boston & Lowell RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1890
- Mason v. KnoxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1891
- Burnham v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
- Login v. WaismanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- Bailey v. HarveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1880
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Amabello v. Colonial MotorsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Aetna Life Insurance v. ChandlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
- Lipman Bros. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
- Ridgway National Bank, Guardian of the Estate of Robert Aiello, a Mental Incompetent v. North American Van Lines, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Chagnon v. PerkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.