Prelli v. Shepard S. S. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BONDY, District Judge.
AH other demands for inspection having been disposed of on the argument, the motion for the production of “libellant's” signed statement by the “respondent” is denied without prejudice to a renewal thereof on the showing of the facts constituting good cause therefor. See Corbett v. Columbia Transp. Co., D. C., 5 F.R.D. 217, 219; Leach v. Greif Bros. Cooperage Corporation, D. C., 2 F.R.D. 444, 445; Thomas French & Sons v. Carleton Venetian Blind Co., D. C., 30 F.Supp. 903, 905; 2 Moore’s Federal Practice, 1946 Supp. p. 241. Compare Price v. Levitt, D. C., 29 F.Supp. 164…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bough v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Thomas French & Sons, Ltd. v. Carleton Venetian Blind Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Price v. LevittDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Leach v. Greif Bros. Cooperage Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1942
- Corbett v. Columbia Transp. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1946
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lester v. Isbrandtsen Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1950