Legal Opinion
Kitfield v. Henderson, Black & Greene
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 26, 1998No. A97A1717PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Chief Judge.
David B. Kitfield, Inc. and David B. Kitfield (Kitfield) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Henderson, Black & Greene and Kenneth M. Hendricks (HBG). For the reasons which follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. . . .’’Lau’s Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 (405 SE2d 474) (1991).…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Moses v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Porter v. FelkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- E. D. Lacey Mills, Inc. v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Ely v. Stratoflex, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Phinazee v. Interstate Nationalease, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Physician Specialists in Anesthesia, P.C. v. WildmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Brewer v. SchachtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Amstadter v. Liberty Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Crews v. WahlCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.