Radar v. Rogers
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
SHENK, J.,
Dissenting.—It is the general rule, applicable in this case, that in order properly to commence an action there must first be a party then in existence capable of being sued and against whom a judgment may be entered. Secondly, facts must exist at that time which when alleged would be sufficient to support a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. Here neither condition existed.
Section 714 of the Probate Code requires that the holder of a claim must “bring suit” in the proper court against the executor or administrator, within three months after the date of service of notice of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Fontana Land Co. v. LaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Neff v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.