Legal Opinion

Gorham v. Guidant Mutual Insurance

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 20, 2000No. Civ.AMD 99-1442PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DAVIS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this action, here under the diversity of citizenship jurisdiction and arising under the law of Maryland, plaintiff Sherry Ann Gorham has sued Guidant Mutual Insurance Company and its predecessors and successors in interest (hereafter “Gui-dant”), the company that issued an automobile liability policy to her employer. Gorham was seriously injured in- an accident caused by an “underinsured motorist.” She alleges, therefore, that under the circumstances of this case, she is entitled to recover compensation pursuant to the uninsured/underinsured…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roden v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Dove v. AMCO Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
  3. Roden v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API