Legal Opinion

Himmelstein v. Budner

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 16, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 21-49PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEECH, District Judge.

This is an action for breach of contract. The plaintiff claims damages in the amount of $4,680.51 arising from defendant’s breach of an implied warranty under an agreement to sell plaintiff a dry-cleaning business. The defendant filed a counterclaim asking return of certain items of his personal property detained by the plaintiff, or their value of $600, plus $100 damages for their detention. The defendant also filed a supplemental counterclaim for the sum of $2700.50, representing obligations of the defendant assumed by plaintiff on purchase of the dry-cleaning…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re KeenanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Kurriss v. Conrad & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Thompson v. RectorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  4. Fries, Beall & Sharp Co. v. LivingstoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
  5. Abraham v. GendlinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morfessis v. Sterling Metalware CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. In re Belle-Moc, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1960
  3. Hagedorn v. TaggartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API