Legal Opinion

Nordstrom v. Connecticut Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided July 5, 1935No. File #5560Published

1Opinion of the CourtHamlin, J.

This is an action in negligence, in which the defendant moves to set aside the verdict for $5,000., as contrary to the law and the evidence.

There are two important questions. (1) Viewing all the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, does the *126light from the trolley car, which the jury found to have existed, constitute negligence as a matter of law? The plain' tiff described the light as a “flash”. The plaintiff’s only supporting witness repeatedly said, “It was just a flash”; but no evidence as to whether it came from the headlight or from a short circuit or some part of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. French v. W. W. Mertz Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Spoatea v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Tupper v. Union Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API