Legal Opinion

In Re Walker

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 2007No. B190637PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLUSS, P. J.

Fourteen years ago this court rejected Hudie Joyce Walker’s contention the failure of her trial counsel to introduce expert testimony on intimate partner battering and its effects 1 constituted ineffective assistance of counsel, explaining that her lawyer had made a “rational and informed decision on trial strategy” because the evidence would have undermined Walker’s claim she accidentally shot and killed her abusive husband Thomas Walker while struggling with him for a gun and, in any event, would not have supported a self-defense or imperfect self-defense theory because…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cathryn Ann Linn v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. People v. BattleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. People v. MoralesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API