Legal Opinion

Fortin v. Mayor of Chicopee

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 9, 1950PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

General Laws (Ter. Ed.) c. 41, § 100, as appearing in St. 1945, c. 670, provides that a city “shall indemnify” a fireman or a member of the fire department “to an amount not more than the amount recommended by the board or officer authorized to appoint” such fireman or *215member “for expenses or damages sustained by him while acting as” such fireman or member, including loss of pay by reason of absence from duty because of temporary incapacity caused by injury suffered through no fault of his own while in the actual performance of duty.1 See Quinlan v. Cambridge, 320 Mass. 124, 128.

This is a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ham v. Board of PoliceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  2. Rea v. Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Higgins v. License Commissioners of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Bay State Street Railway Co. v. City of WoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Quinlan v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. MacArthur v. Massachusetts Hospital Service, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  2. Berube v. Selectmen of EdgartownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  3. Politano v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. Seibolt v. County of MiddlesexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. Pelayo v. City of DowneyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API