Legal Opinion

Federated Mutual Insurance v. Anderson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1996No. 95-569PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

Federated Mutual Insurance Company filed a complaint in the District Court for the Fourth Judicial District in Missoula County in which it sought to recover from Conifer Logging, Inc., amounts Federated had paid to its insured, Jones Equipment, Inc., for the loss of logging equipment Jones had leased to Conifer. Conifer filed a third-party complaint against John Deere Insurance Company in which it sought indemnity for any amounts which it might owe Federated. John Deere moved the District Court for summary judgment. Conifer filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. After hearing oral…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bemis v. LeonardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Brinkman & Lenon, Architects & Engineers v. P & D Land EnterprisesMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Glacier General Assurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Johnson v. KillingsworthMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Head v. Central Reserve Life of North America InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Federated Mutual Insurance v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Bi-Lo Foods, Inc. v. Alpine Bank, CliftonMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Budtel Associates, LP v. Continental Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Lee v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Tipp v. SkjelsetMontana Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API