Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Nieves

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 2000No. 82 Capital Appeal DocketPublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This is a direct appeal pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 722(4) and 9711(h). Following a jury trial, Appellant was convicted of first degree murder and possession of an instrument of crime. The jury found one aggravating circumstance, that the victim and Appellant had been associated in the manufacture or distribution of a controlled substance and the killing was related to that association, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9711(d)(14). As no mitigating circumstances were found, Appellant was sentenced to death. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and grant a new trial.

The record establishes…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RandallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. UderraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. JermynSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RiggSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. PanderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. MichaudSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API