Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 30, 1992No. 91-4057PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.
This insurance dispute between El Paso Natural Gas Company and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Corporation involves liability for the cleanup of El. Paso’s gas transmission system. Hartford brought an action for declaratory relief, and subsequently Hartford and El Paso both moved for summary judgment to determine whether Hartford’s comprehensive general liability insurance excluded coverage of continuous pollution. The District Court for the District of Utah found the pollution exclusion clause precluded coverage for pollution except when discharges- were both…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Technicon Electronics Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Hecla Mining Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- A. Johnson & Co., Inc., and A. Johnson Energy Marketing, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. U.S. Fidelity And Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992