Legal Opinion
Stockholders & Spouses of Carioca Co. v. Superior Court
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided September 5, 1984No. 17414-SAPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
The petitioners, the stockholders of Cari-oca Oil Company (Carioca), brought this petition for special action from an adverse ruling by the respondent judge in an action by the City of Tempe condemning petitioner’s land. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. Art. 6, § 5(3) and Rule 8, Arizona Rules for Special Actions, 17A A.R.S.
We must answer only one question on appeal and that is, did the trial court err in not allowing Carioca to introduce evidence concerning the rental value of Carioca’s lease with Union Oil Company of California?
The facts follow. Carioca owned…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Defnet Land & Investment Co. v. State Ex Rel. HermanArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Scottsdale v. Eller Outdoor Advertising Co. of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- State v. LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Levitin v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Kayo Oil Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maricopa County v. BarkleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. FillerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Cardi American Corp. v. All American House & Apartment Movers, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Ambrosio v. Progressive Preferred Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Cardi American Corp. All American House & Apartment MoversCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009