Legal Opinion
Stone v. Stone
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 4, 2004No. Nos. 2D03-2581, 2D03-2591PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SALCINES, Judge.
In this consolidated appeal, Michael Bernard Stone appeals the denial of his pro se “Complaint-Motion to Enforce Settlement for Failure to Perform Accord and Motion for Property Lien Attachment and For Wage Garnishment Against All Plaintiffs” in circuit court case numbers 00-4215 and 00-4865. In the “complaint-motion,” Mr. Stone sought to enforce the terms of a settlement agreement he had entered into with Melvin J. Stone, Rolelia S. Moore, Carrie M. Bell, James D. Stone, Jacquelyn S.Cress, Carolyn S. Holifield, and Melvin M. Stone (“Appellees”). We affirm in part and vacate…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paulucci v. General Dynamics Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
- MCR FUNDING v. CMG Funding Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- 84 Lumber Co. v. CooperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. FryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Green-Mar Builders, Inc. v. PearlmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bank One, NA v. BatronieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Livingston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Romero v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Livingston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017