Legal Opinion

Kahan Jewelry Corp. v. Venus Casting, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lewis Bart Stone, J.

This proceeding was commenced by notice of motion, dated April 23, 2007, by petitioner Kahan Jewelry Corp., pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 7510, to confirm an arbitration award dated March 11, 2007 against respondent, Venus Casting, Inc. On May 22, 2007, Venus replied and served a cross motion to vacate the award pursuant to CPLR 7511.

The parties are in the jewelry business and have been doing business with each other for over 15 years. For the last seven years, this business involved hundreds of transactions conducted in a similar way.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. In re the Arbitration between the Acting Superintendent of Schools of Liverpool Central School District v. United Liverpool Faculty Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. In re the Arbitration between Marlene Industries Corp. & Carnac Textiles, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. v. LuckieNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. In re the Arbitration between Matarasso & Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perez-Tejada v. Mattress Firm Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API