Blancarte v. Arizona Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THUMMA, Judge.
¶ 1 In this employment termination case, we determine which of four decision makers is entitled to deference and whether the appropriate fact finder abused its discretion. Finding we owe deference to the Arizona State Personnel Board, we hold the Board did not abuse its discretion in affirming the Arizona Department of Transportation’s (“ADOT”) dismissal of Mary M. Blancarte from her position as an ADOT customer service representative (“CSR”). Accordingly, we reverse the superior court’s decision and remand with instructions that the superior court enter judgment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zavala v. Arizona State Personnel BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Arizona Commercial Diving Services, Inc. v. Applied Diving Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Johns v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Evans v. STATE, EX REL. ARIZONA CORP. COM'NCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
3Cited by2 opinions
- Berndt v. Arizona Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Berndt v. Arizona Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015