Kennedy v. State

WHITHAM, Justice.

Appellant appeals a conviction for promotion of obscenity. We find no merit in any of appellant’s seven points of error. Accordingly, we affirm.

In his first point of error, appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction because it fails to show that appellant committed a voluntary act in "exhibiting” obscene devices as charged in the information. At the outset, we note the specific issue raised by appellant. Appellant does not question that the property seized was “obscene devices.” Appellant does not question that appellant worked in a store…