Legal Opinion
Freeze v. United States
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided November 15, 2004No. CIV.1:03 CV 00596PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BULLOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought the present action pro se against Dr. Donald Durham Volkmer 1 on June 25, 2003, alleging constitutional violations and common law torts. On November 6, 2003, the United States Attorney filed a notice of substitution for the purpose of substituting the United States of America for defendant Volkmer as a party to this action and certified that defendant Volkmer was acting within the scope of his federal employment at the time of the incidents giving rise to the suit. For the reasons stated herein, the court will grant Defendants’…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ronnie Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Sanchez v. McLainDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2011
- Donahue v. ConnollyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Whedbee v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Adeyola v. SriwastavaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.