Legal Opinion
In Re Detention of TAH-L.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 13, 2004No. 52754-1-IPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
97 P.3d 767 (2004)
In re the Detention of T.A.H.-L.,
Snohomish County, Respondent,
v.
T.A.H.-L., Appellant.
No. 52754-1-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
September 13, 2004.
Jason Jerome Cummings, Snohomish CO Prosecutor, Seth Aaron Fine, Snohomish Co. Pros. Atty., Everett, WA, and Raymond J. Dearie, Bullivant Houser Bailey PC, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
Elaine L. Winters, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
COX, C.J.
T.A. H.-L. ("H.-L.") appeals her involuntary 90-day civil commitment under chapter 71.05 RCW. We hold that a person who is the subject of a petition…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Grado v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
- In re the Care & Treatment of OntiberosSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- In re Henry B.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- State v. StoutCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- In re BraddySupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.