Legal Opinion

Black Diamond Collieries v. Carden

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gbeeu

This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Chapter 123 of the Acts of 1919. The only question presented is whether the defendant in error is entitled to recover as for the loss of a leg or as for the loss of a foot. The trial judge held that he. was entitled to recover as for a leg, and the employer has appealed.

The statute — section 28, subsec. (c) — provides for recovery as follows:

“For the loss of a foot, fifty per centum of average weekly wages during one hundred and twenty-five (125) weeks.
“For the loss of a leg, fifty per centum of the average weekly wages during one…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Payne v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shores v. ShoresTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Coker v. Armco Drainage & Metal Products Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Key v. Briar Hill CollieriesTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Schell v. Central Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  5. Louis T. Hooper Tire Co. v. ManeeseTennessee Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API