Legal Opinion

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 10, 1993No. 92-2061PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

After Terrence Fahy was run over by an asphalt roller built by Dresser Industries, Inc., he sued and won a $3 million verdict. Dresser’s primary insurer, Fidelity and Casualty Insurance Company of New York, paid $1 million of Fahy’s award. Dresser’s excess carrier, Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, and Companies in Interest (“Lloyd’s”), paid $2 million. Lloyd’s is now suing Fidelity to recoup the $2 million, claiming that Fidelity negligently failed to settle Fahy’s product liability suit against Dresser for $75,-000. The district judge granted Fidelity’s motion for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ranger Insurance v. Home Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  2. American Centennial Insurance v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  3. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London & Companies in Interest, Subscribing to Cover Notes RLJ2197 and RLJ2197a v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's, London v. The Fidelity And Casualty Insurance Company Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Armintrout v. Chicago Title Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
  3. Gonzalez Reyes v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. Western Towboat Company v. Vigor Marine LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API