Armintrout v. Chicago Title Insurance Company
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 JUSTIN ARMINTROUT AND DEAN CASE NO. 2:22-cv-00627-LK 11 ARMINTROUT, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 12 Plaintiffs, REMAND AND DENYING v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY 13 JUDGMENT AS MOOT CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE 14 COMPANY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 This matter comes before the Court on a motion to remand by Plaintiffs Justin and Dean 18 Armintrout (the “Armintrouts”). Dkt. No. 7. For the reasons explained below, the Court grants the 19 motion. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 This action arises from the Armintrouts’ discovery that their…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Matheson v. Progressive Specialty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.