Legal Opinion

Lawrence J. Krug v. Vince Imbordino Rufino Dominguez Arthur Hanratty Maricopa County, Az James Martin Garth Smith State of Arizona

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1990No. 88-15222PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

Lawrence Krug appeals pro se the district court’s order granting summary judgment in his action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 (1982). He alleges numerous improprieties in connection with a 1979 search, arrest and confinement, and a 1980 arrest, seizure of property, bail denial, confinement, and plea agreement. Because Krug’s claims are either barred by the statute of limitations or are meritless, we affirm.

I

Krug alleges that in June of 1979, Arizona deputy sheriffs Hanratty and Dominguez and others searched his apartment without a warrant and without his consent. He…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Charles Leonard Elliott v. City of Union CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Gilbert Hostler v. Captain Groves Robert J. Flanagan David R. MacKay Robert I. Cassady Frank Terry Richard T. Cezanc Donald B. Wawrzaszek Troy WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Feldman v. GogosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Hurle Bradley v. St. Landry ParishCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API