Legal Opinion
Lape v. Pennsylvania
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 22, 2005No. 05-1094UnpublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Sharen Anderson was an employee of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (“DOC”) at the Community Corrections Center #2 (“CCC #2”) in Pittsburgh in 1998. She may have developed a relationship with Michael Lape, an inmate who was housed at that facility, and she subsequently married him after he was paroled. 1 The DOC investigated Anderson’s conduct and concluded that she had violated the DOC’s Code of Ethics. For that reason, Anderson was discharged. In response, Anderson initiated this action against multiple DOC officials and employees alleging…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Cross v. Baltimore City Police DepartmentCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Abreu v. FergusonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- BUXTON v. WETZELDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- Benton v. Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- CHRISTIAN v. GARMANDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.