Legal Opinion

Milton v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 2005No. COA04-991PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

Interlocutory orders that have not been certified by the trial court and do not affect a substantial right are not immediately appealable. Liggett Group Inc. v. Sunas, 113 N.C. App. 19, 23-24, 437 S.E.2d 674, 677 (1993). In this case, Defendants appeal from an order denying a Motion to Enforce Settlement in a personal injury action. Because this Court has previously held that an appeal from a denial to enforce a settlement agreement in a workers’ compensation case did not affect a substantial right, we likewise must conclude that an appeal from a denial to enforce a settlement…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Bailey v. GoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. North Carolina Department of Transportation v. PageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Liggett Group, Inc. v. SunasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Ratchford v. C.C. Mangum Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate of Vaughn v. Pike Electric, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. Paxton v. PaxtonNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Jones v. Durham Anesthesia Associates, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Dunn v. State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Blow v. DSM Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API